Can you describe a time when you had to make a tough editorial decision that went against popular opinion?
Behavioral
Editorial Judgment
Communication
Decision-making
This question assesses your editorial judgment and ability to maintain integrity in your role as an Editor In Chief, especially when facing pressure from stakeholders.
How to answer
- Describe the context and the popular opinion at the time.
- Explain the reasoning behind your decision, including any data or insights that informed it.
- Detail how you communicated this decision to your team and stakeholders.
- Share the outcome of your decision, including any backlash or support received.
- Highlight what you learned from this experience and how it shaped your editorial approach.
What not to say
- Avoid blaming others for the decision or external pressures.
- Don't provide an example where you simply followed the majority opinion.
- Steer clear of vague responses that lack specific details.
- Avoid discussing decisions without mentioning the rationale.
Sample answer
“At The Guardian, I faced pressure to publish an article that sensationalized a trending topic. However, I believed it would mislead our readers. I gathered audience insights showing a desire for in-depth analysis rather than sensationalism. I communicated my decision to the editorial team, emphasizing our commitment to integrity. Ultimately, we published a well-researched piece that was well-received and increased our reader trust. This experience reinforced my belief in prioritizing quality over clicks.”
Ready to rehearse this answer out loud?
Practice this question